Gates v. Ives et al
Tyler Gates |
Matt Ives and Richard Pasha |
2:2023cv00089 |
December 4, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Montana |
Dana L Christensen |
Brian Morris |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
MINUTE ENTRY for proceedings held before Judge Dana L. Christensen: Telephonic Pretrial Conference held on 1/31/2024. (Law Clerk: E. Steinberg), (Hearing held in Missoula, MT) (ASG) |
Filing 12 PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL STATEMENT by Richard Pasha. (Christensen, Amy) |
Filing 11 PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL STATEMENT by Matt Ives. (Wilson, Jon) |
Filing 10 PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL STATEMENT by Tyler Gates. (Vicevich, David) |
Filing 9 STATEMENT OF STIPULATED FACTS by Tyler Gates. (Vicevich, David) |
Filing 8 JOINT DISCOVERY PLAN by Tyler Gates. (Vicevich, David) |
|
Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by Richard Pasha. (Christensen, Amy) |
|
|
Filing 3 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by Matt Ives. (Wilson, Jon) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. Issued summons may be downloaded and printed by counsel for service. (SAJ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Matt Ives, Richard Pasha, filed by Tyler Gates. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons Matt Ives, #3 Proposed Summons Richard Pasha) (SAJ) |
Filing fee: $ 405, receipt number AMTDC-3171191. (SAJ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.