Great Harvest Franchising v. Green et al
Great Harvest Franchising |
Gregory Andrew Williams Green and Kimberly Elaine Green |
2:2024cv00032 |
May 13, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of Montana |
Brian Morris |
Trademark |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 13, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Great Harvest Franchising identifying Corporate Parent Great Harvest Franchishing, Inc. for Great Harvest Franchising.. (Lervick, Jeana) |
Filing 4 Brief/Memorandum in Support re #3 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order filed by Great Harvest Franchising. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Affidavit of John Michael Ferretti, #2 Exhibit B - Great Harvest Franchise Agreement, #3 Exhibit C - Affidavit of Christy Peterson) (Lervick, Jeana) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order . Jeana R. Lervick appearing for Plaintiff Great Harvest Franchising. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed TRO) (Lervick, Jeana) |
Filing 2 AO 120 Patent and Trademark form transmitted to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Lervick, Jeana) |
Filing 1 VERIFIED COMPLAINT against Gregory Andrew Williams Green, Kimberly Elaine Green, filed by Great Harvest Franchising. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Great Harvest Franchise Agreement, #2 Exhibit B - Letter, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (ACC) |
Filing fee: $ 405.00, receipt number AMTDC-3260800 (ACC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.