Roadarmel Construction Inc. et al v. IL Truck Group LLC et al
Roadarmel Construction Inc. and Jack Roadarmel |
John Does 1-X and IL Truck Group LLC |
2:2024cv00038 |
May 30, 2024 |
U.S. District Court for the District of Montana |
Brian Morris |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File File Documents. Terry Schaplow appearing for Plaintiffs Jack Roadarmel, Roadarmel Construction Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Doctors note, #2 Text of Proposed Order) (Schaplow, Terry) |
![]() |
Filing 5 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File File Documents. Terry Schaplow appearing for Plaintiffs Jack Roadarmel, Roadarmel Construction Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Doctors note, #2 Text of Proposed Order) (Schaplow, Terry) |
Filing 4 Disclosure Statement by IL Truck Group LLC. (Conroy, Devon) |
Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by IL Truck Group LLC. (Conroy, Devon) |
![]() |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by IL Truck Group LLC from Eighteenth Judicial District Court of Montana, Gallatin County, case number DV-16-2024-0000443-BC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Ex. 1 to Notice of Removal - Complaint, #3 Exhibit Ex. 2 to Notice of Removal - Summons) (SAJ) |
Filing fee: $ 405, receipt number AMTDC-3270996 (SAJ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.