Santos v. Montana State Hospital et al
| Jose Santos, II |
| Montana State Hospital, Hill County and State of Montana |
| 4:2009cv00004 |
| January 12, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Montana |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
| HILL |
| Sam E Haddon |
| Keith Strong |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
8
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 5 in full. Plaintiff's Complaint 2 is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. This dismissal shall count as a strike because Plaintiff failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Any appeal from this disposition would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Sam E Haddon on 3/11/2009. Copy mailed to Santos. (TAG, )
|
|
Filing
5
Order granting 1 Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis and FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 2 Complaint IFP/Prisoner filed by Jose Santos, II. Recommendation: Plaintiff's Complaint should be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for failure to file within t he applicable statute of limitations and failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. This dismissal should be counted as one strike pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). The Court should CERTIFY that any appeal of this decision would not be taken in good faith. Objections to F&R due by 3/9/2009. Signed by Magistrate Keith Strong on 2/19/2009. Copy mailed to Santos. (ASG, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
