Hirt v. Law et al
Patrick Keith Hirt |
Sam Law, Mike Mahoney, Mike Ferriter, Crossroads Correctional Center, C.C.A., Corrections Corporation of America, Toole County Library Board of Directors, Heidi Alford, Linda O'Conner, K. Kenyon, B. Sherrard, Cindy Clark and Teddy J Ward |
4:2009cv00106 |
October 30, 2009 |
US District Court for the District of Montana |
Great Falls Office |
CHOTEAU |
Sam E Haddon |
Keith Strong |
Plaintiff |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 4 in full. Plaintiff's Complaint 2 is DISMISSED, the dismissal counts as a strike pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(g), and the Court certifies that any appeal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Sam E Haddon on 1/29/2010. Copy mailed to Hirt. (TAG, ) |
Filing 4 ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; 2 Complaint IFP/Prisoner filed by Patrick Keith Hirt. Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis is GRANTED. This matter should be DISMISSED, Hir t should be assesed a strike pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), and the Court should certify that any appeal of this decision would not be taken in good faith. Objections to F&R due by 12/10/2009. Signed by Magistrate Keith Strong on 11/20/2009. Copy mailed to Hirt. (TAG, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.