United States of America v. Harada
||United States of America
||June 23, 2011
||US District Court for the District of Montana
||Great Falls Office
||Sam E Haddon
|Nature of Suit:
||Recovery of Defaulted Student Loans (Excl. Veterans)
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|October 11, 2016
ORDER as to Michelle Harada. The Court has received confirmation that discovery ordered by the Court has been provided. ORDERED: The order to show cause is DISCHARGED. Signed by Judge Sam E Haddon on 10/11/2016. (Copy mailed to Harada) (MMS, ) Modified on 10/11/2016 to reflect copy of order provided to USM (MMS, ).
|October 5, 2016
ORDER: On August 24, 2016, the United States requested the Defendant Michelle Harada (Harada) to produce the following documents on or before September 15, 2016: SEE ORDER. No documents were provided by Harada in response to the requests by September 15, 2016, or at all. ORDERED: 1) Defendant Harada shall have to and including October 14, 2016, in which to serve upon the United States and provide to the Court true and complete copies of each and all of the documents described in paragraph 1-4 a bove. 2) Failure or refusal of Defendant Harada to fully comply with this Order will, without exception, result in issuance of an order of contempt of court directed to her for such failure or refusal to comply. FURTHER ORDERED: The Defendant forthwith shall be personally served with this Order by the United States Marshal Service. (ORDER given to USM for service). Signed by Judge Sam E Haddon on 10/5/2016. (SLR, )
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?