Detham v. Crossroads Correctional Facility

Plaintiff: Travis Detham
Defendant: Crossroads Correctional Facility
Case Number: 4:2012cv00027
Filed: April 11, 2012
Court: Montana District Court
Office: Great Falls Office
County: CHOTEAU
Presiding Judge: Sam E Haddon
Referring Judge: Keith Strong
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
July 13, 2012 6 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 4 in full. The 1 Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, this dismissal counts as a strike pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(g), and the Court certifies that any appeal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Sam E Haddon on 7/13/2012. Mailed to Dethman. (TAG, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Detham v. Crossroads Correctional Facility
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Travis Detham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Crossroads Correctional Facility
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.