Wagoner v. Colvin
Plaintiff: Mark A. Wagoner
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Case Number: 4:2015cv00112
Filed: December 30, 2015
Court: US District Court for the District of Montana
Office: Great Falls Office
County: VALLEY
Presiding Judge: John Johnston
Nature of Suit: Disability Insurance
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 31, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER: re 18 Social Security Opening Brief. 1. Mr. Wagoner's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 10) is DENIED. 2. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of Defendant CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security. Signed by Magistrate Judge John Johnston on 1/31/2017. (ACC)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wagoner v. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mark A. Wagoner
Represented By: Russell A. LaVigne, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Represented By: Daphne Banay
Represented By: Leif M. Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?