Darvis et al v. Them et al
||Rick Darvis, National Instituted of Certified College Planners and College Funding
||Ronald W. Them, MyCashFlowCoach, Joshua A. Miner and Spike Sales
||June 20, 2017
||US District Court for the District of Montana
||Great Falls Office
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|November 20, 2017
ORDER: Upon consideration of the 30 Stipulation for Dismissal entered into between the Plaintiffs and Defendants; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the claims of Plaintiffs, Rick G. Darvis, National Institute of Certified College Planners, LLC, and College Fundings, Inc. against Defendants Ronald W. Them, MyCashFlowCoach LLC, Joshua A. Miner, and Spike Sales LLC are dismissed with prejudice as fully compromised and settled on the merits, each party to bear their own costs and expenses. Signed by Judge Brian Morris on 11/20/2017. (SLR)
|September 11, 2017
ORDER granting 26 Motion to Vacate 26 Unopposed MOTION to Vacate Set Motion and F&R Deadlines/Hearings, 15 Preliminary Pretrial Conference Order,, . The Preliminary Pretrial Conference and Motions Hearing on September 19, 2017, at 1:30 p.m. is VACATED. The parties will file a status report on or before October 11, 2017 at which time the Court will set a motion hearing if necessary. Signed by Judge Brian Morris on 9/11/2017. (MMS)
|August 21, 2017
ORDER granting 18 Defendants' Motion for attorney Randall A. Miller to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Acknowledgment of PHV Order due by 9/5/2017. Signed by Judge Brian Morris on 8/21/2017. (TLO) Modified on 8/21/2017 to reflect order mailed to PHV cnsl Randall A. Miller (TLO).
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?