Richey v. BNSF Railway Company et al
Plaintiff: Elmore B. Richey
Defendant: BNSF Railway Company, John Swing, Mine Safety Appliance, Robinson Insulation Company and Does A-Z
Case Number: 4:2017cv00080
Filed: August 16, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of Montana
Office: Great Falls Office
County: CASCADE
Presiding Judge: John Johnston
Presiding Judge: Brian Morris
Nature of Suit: Asbestos Personal Injury Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 3, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED the Plaintiff will re-file the 32 Motion for Leave to Amend the Complaint, and any other filings that reflect the amended caption Collen L. Johnson, as Personal Representative for the Estate of Elmore B. Richey, Deceased. The caption cannot be amended before the Court rules on the Motion for Leave to Amend the Complaint. Signed by Judge Brian Morris on 10/3/2017. (SLR)
September 21, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER granting 22 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Caleena D. Svatek for BNSF Railway Company,Caleena D. Svatek for John Swing.( Acknowledgment of PHV Order due by 10/6/2017.) re: 24 Motion to Amend/Correct; Signed by Judge Brian Morris on 9/21/2017. (LJM)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Richey v. BNSF Railway Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Elmore B. Richey
Represented By: John F. Lacey
Represented By: Allan M. McGarvey
Represented By: Roger M. Sullivan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BNSF Railway Company
Represented By: Chad M. Knight
Represented By: Anthony Michael Nicastro
Represented By: Nadia A. Patrick
Represented By: Steven T. Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Swing
Represented By: Chad M. Knight
Represented By: Anthony Michael Nicastro
Represented By: Nadia A. Patrick
Represented By: Steven T. Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mine Safety Appliance
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Robinson Insulation Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does A-Z
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?