Rodarte v. Salmonson et al
| Francisco Rodarte |
| James Salmonson and Attorney General of the State of Montana |
| 4:2018cv00119 |
| September 11, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Montana |
| John Johnston |
| Brian Morris |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #4 Motion for Extension of Time to File Objection to Findings and Recommendations. Objections are to be filed on or before Friday, November 9, 2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge John Johnston on 10/9/2018. Mailed to Rodarte (TAG)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION for Extension of Time to File #3 Objection to Findings and Recommendations by Petitioner Francisco Rodarte (TAG) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Francisco Rodarte. #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis GRANTED. Judge Magistrate Judge John Johnston termed. Signed by Magistrate Judge John Johnston on 9/13/2018. Mailed to Rodarte (TAG)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Petitioner Francisco Rodarte. Motions referred to John Johnston. (Attachments: #1 Account Statement) (TAG) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5 not paid), filed by Francisco Rodarte. (TAG) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
