Dye v. Valley County et al
Reese Dye |
Valley County, Luke Strommen and John Does 1-3 |
4:2020cv00104 |
November 3, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Montana |
Brian Morris |
P.I.: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL CONFERENCE ORDER: Preliminary Pretrial Statement due by 1/13/2021. Joint Discovery Plan due by 1/13/2021. Statement of Stipulated Facts due by 1/13/2021. Telephonic Pretrial Conference set for 1/20/2021 at 04:30 PM before Judge Brian Morris. Signed by Judge Brian Morris on 12/14/2020. (MMS) |
Filing 5 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by Luke Strommen. (Holden, Jason) |
Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Valley County. Valley County waiver sent on 11/13/2020, answer due 1/12/2021. (Krogh, Harlan) |
Filing 3 AMENDED Summonses Issued as to Luke Strommen, Valley County. (Attachments: #1 Strommen Amended Summons) (Service copies emailed to Cnsl) (ACC) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Luke Strommen, Valley County. (Attachments: #1 Strommens Summons). Original summonses and copies of complaint mailed to Cnsl Cook. (LJM) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against John Does 1-3, Luke Strommen, Valley County, filed by Reese Dye. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (LJM) |
Filing fee: $ 400.00, receipt number MTX400014938 (LJM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.