Younglove Construction v. Larsen Engineering
Plaintiff: Younglove Construction
Defendant: Larsen Engineering
Case Number: 4:2021cv00001
Filed: January 7, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Montana
Presiding Judge: Brian Morris
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 3, 2021 Filing 27 PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL STATEMENT by Younglove Construction. (Brown, Bradford)
March 3, 2021 Filing 26 STATEMENT OF STIPULATED FACTS by Younglove Construction. (Brown, Bradford)
March 3, 2021 Filing 25 PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL STATEMENT by Larsen Engineering. (Hutchens, Michael)
March 3, 2021 Filing 24 JOINT DISCOVERY PLAN by Younglove Construction. (Brown, Bradford)
February 9, 2021 Filing 23 NOTICE of Acknowledgment of Pro Hac Vice Order by Larsen Engineering re #19 Order on Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Hutchens, Michael)
February 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 22 TEXT Order: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion to Amend/Correct, Doc. 21 is GRANTED. The Telephonic Pretrial Conference set for March 10, 2021 is VACATED and RESET for March 11, 2021 at 01:30 PM BY TELEPHONE before Judge Brian Morris. All other provisions of this Court's Order, Doc. 13, remain in effect. Signed by Judge Brian Morris on 2/5/2021. (SLL)
February 5, 2021 Filing 21 MOTION to Amend/Correct #13 Preliminary Pretrial Conference Order, Bradford James Brown appearing for Plaintiff Younglove Construction (Brown, Bradford)
February 5, 2021 Remark: PHV Counsel Michael Hutchens is now a registered electronic CM/ECF user. (SLR)
February 3, 2021 Filing 20 Letter from Tyler P. Gilman, Clerk of Court, to PHV Counsel Michael Hutchens re EM/ECF registration. Letter mailed to Counsel Hutchens. (SLR)
February 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER granting #12 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Michael D. Hutchens for Larsen Engineering. SEE ORDER FOR FULL DETAILS AND DEADLINE. Order mailed to Counsel Hutchens. Signed by Judge Brian Morris on 2/3/2021. (SLR)
February 3, 2021 Filing 18 NOTICE of Acknowledgment of Pro Hac Vice Order by Larsen Engineering re #15 Order on Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, (Radmer, John)
February 2, 2021 Filing 17 Remark: Attorney John Radmer is now a registered user. (MMS)
January 26, 2021 Filing 16 Letter from Tyler P. Gilman, Clerk of Court, to PHV Counsel John Radmer re CM/ECF registration. Letter mailed to Counsel Radmer. (ACC)
January 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER: Defendant has moved for an order allowing John E. Radmer, Esq., (Mr. Radmer) to appear pro hac vice in this case with Laura J. Hanson, Esq. designatedas local counsel. Mr. Radmer's application appears to be in compliance with L.R. 83.1(d). IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: Defendant's #14 motion to allow Mr. Radmer to appear on its behalf is GRANTED, subject to the following conditions: **SEE ORDER FOR FULL DETAILS**. Signed by Judge Brian Morris on 1/26/2021. (ACC)
January 26, 2021 Filing 14 MOTION John E. Radmer to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 262 receipt number 0977-2606735.) Laura Jean Hanson appearing for Defendant Larsen Engineering (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Declaration of John E. Radmer Supporting Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice, #2 Text of Proposed Order Granting John E. Radmer Pro Hac Vice) (Hanson, Laura)
January 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL CONFERENCE ORDER: Preliminary Pretrial Statement due by 3/3/2021. Joint Discovery Plan due by 3/3/2021. Statement of Stipulated Facts due by 3/3/2021. Telephonic Pretrial Conference set for 3/10/2021 at 02:30 PM in Great Falls, MT before Judge Brian Morris. SEE ORDER FOR FULL DETAILS, DEADLINES, AND CALL-IN INFORMATION. Signed by Judge Brian Morris on 1/26/2021. (SLR)
January 26, 2021 Filing 12 MOTION Michael D. Hutchens to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 262 receipt number 0977-2606720.) Laura Jean Hanson appearing for Defendant Larsen Engineering (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Declaration of Michael D. Hutchens Supporting Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice, #2 Text of Proposed Order Granting D. Hutchens Pro Hac Vice) (Hanson, Laura)
January 26, 2021 Filing 11 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by Larsen Engineering. (Hanson, Laura)
January 15, 2021 Remark: Counsel Stan Beck and Geoffrey Palachuk are now registered CM/ECF electronic users. (SLR)
January 14, 2021 Filing 10 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF SERVICE Executed January 8, 2021 Acknowledgement filed by Younglove Construction. (Brown, Bradford)
January 12, 2021 Filing 9 NOTICE of Acknowledgment of Pro Hac Vice Order by Younglove Construction re #6 Letter (Brown, Bradford)
January 12, 2021 Filing 8 NOTICE of Acknowledgment of Pro Hac Vice Order by Younglove Construction re #7 Letter (Brown, Bradford)
January 7, 2021 Filing 7 Letter from Tyler P. Gilman, Clerk of Court, to PHV Counsel Geoffrey Palachuk re CM/ECF registration. Letter mailed to Counsel Palachuk (ACC)
January 7, 2021 Filing 6 Letter from Tyler P. Gilman, Clerk of Court, to PHV Counsel Stanton Beck re CM/ECF registration. Letter mailed to Counsel Beck. (ACC)
January 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: Plaintiff has moved for an order allowing Stanton F. Beck, Esq., and Geoffrey F. Palachuk, Esq. to appear pro hac vice in this case with Brad J. Brown, Esq., designated as local counsel. The applications of Mr. Beck and Mr. Palachuck appear to be in compliance with L.R. 83.1(d). IT IS ORDERED: Plaintiff's #4 motions to allow Mr. Beck and Mr. Palachuck to appear on their behalf are GRANTED, subject to the following conditions: **SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS** Signed by Judge Brian Morris on 1/7/2021. (ACC)
January 7, 2021 Filing 4 MOTION Stanton P. Beck and Geoffrey F. Palachuk to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 262 receipt number 0977-2597499.) Bradford James Brown appearing for Plaintiff Younglove Construction (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Exhibit 1 to Motion, #2 Affidavit Exhibit 2 to Motion) (Brown, Bradford) Modified on 1/7/2021 to reflect receipt number as to second Pro Hac Vice attorney MTX900015772 for $262.00 (MMS).
January 7, 2021 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Larsen Engineering. (Emailed to Cnsl Brown) (ACC)
January 7, 2021 Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Younglove Construction identifying Corporate Parent Younglove Construction LLC for Younglove Construction.. (Brown, Bradford)
January 7, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Larsen Engineering, filed by Younglove Construction. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (ACC)
January 7, 2021 Filing fee: $ 402.00, receipt number 0977-2597429 (ACC)
January 7, 2021 Filing fee: $ 262.00, receipt number MTX900015772 in regards to Pro Hac Vice Motion #4 . (MMS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Younglove Construction v. Larsen Engineering
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Younglove Construction
Represented By: Stanton P. Beck
Represented By: Geoffrey F. Palachuk
Represented By: Bradford James Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Larsen Engineering
Represented By: Laura Jean Hanson
Represented By: John E. Radmer
Represented By: Michael D. Hutchens
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?