Bertelsen v Dunhop et al.
| Shayne Bertelsen |
| Pete Dunhop, Asst. Miss Catherine and Attorney General of the State of Montana |
| 4:2021cv00102 |
| October 4, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Montana |
| Brian Morris |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER. Response due within 14 days of Order. Signed by Judge Brian Morris on 11/29/2021. Mailed to Bertelsen with ifp form (TAG)
|
| Filing 8 Letter from Bertelsen (TAG) |
| Filing 7 Letter from Bertelsen (TAG) |
| Filing 6 Letter from Bertelsen (TAG) |
| Filing 5 SUPPLEMENT re #3 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Shayne Bertelsen. (Attachments: #1 Supplement, #2 Supplement) (TAG) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/15/2021: #3 Documents received over the counter on 11/12/21) (TAG). |
| Mail sent to Bertelsen re #2 mislabeled and Returned. Remailed to Bertelsen at CCC (TAG) |
| Filing 4 SUPPLEMENT by Shayne Bertelsen. (Attachments: #1 Supplement) (TAG) |
| Filing 3 AMENDED PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Shayne Bertelsen. (TAG) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER. Response due within 21 days of Order. Signed by Judge Brian Morris on 10/7/2021. Mailed to Bertelsen with forms as directed. (TAG)
|
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5 not paid), filed by Shayne Bertelsen. (TAG) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
