Guillen v. Mr. Johnson et al
Plaintiff: Alberto Guillen
Defendant: Mr. Johnson, Mr. Cannon and Peter Bludworth
Case Number: 4:2022cv00019
Filed: February 25, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Montana
Presiding Judge: John Johnston
Referring Judge: Brian Morris
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions (Prison Condition)
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER Directing Clerk to Serve defendant(s); Waiver of Service of Summons is due within 30 days of this Order. An answer or other appropriate motion is due within 60 days of this Order. Waiver of Service due by 5/23/2022. Notice of Appearance due by 6/21/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge John Johnston on 4/25/2022. Mailed to Guillen; documents forward to counsel for CCC as directed (TAG)
April 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT, filed by Alberto Guillen. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 IFP, #3 Letter) (TAG)
April 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER. Amended Pleading due by 4/15/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge John Johnston on 4/1/2022. Mailed to Guillen with form (TAG)
February 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER Directing Monthly Payments be made from Prison Account of Guillen. Signed by Magistrate Judge John Johnston on 2/28/2022. Mailed to Guillen and CCC (TAG)
February 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge John Johnston on 2/28/2022. Mailed to Guillen (TAG)
February 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE OF CASE OPENING re #2 Complaint IFP/Prisoner. Mailed to Guillen with docket sheet (TAG)
February 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 COMPLAINT IFP/PRISONER (Filing fee $ 402 not paid), filed by Alberto Guillen. (Attachment(s): #1 Exhibit A-D) (TAG). Modified on 2/28/2022 to attach legibly scanned exhibits (TAG). Modified on 2/28/2022: complaint deemed filed (TAG).
February 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Alberto Guillen. Motions referred to John Johnston. (Attachments: #1 Account Statement) (TAG)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Guillen v. Mr. Johnson et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alberto Guillen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mr. Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mr. Cannon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Peter Bludworth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?