Bartman v. Slaughter et al
| Joshua Bartman |
| Jessie Slaughter, Cascade County and Does 1-10 |
| Tyrell Nault, Antonio Tigart, Ely Williams, An Melbourne and Does 1-3 |
| 4:2022cv00063 |
| July 5, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Montana |
| John Johnston |
| Brian Morris |
| Prisoner Petitions (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 THIRD PARTY COMPLAINT against Tyrell Nault, Antonio Tigart, Ely Williams, An Melbourne, Does 1-3, filed by Cascade County, Jessie Slaughter. (Document re-filed by the clerks office in order to get the third party complaint on the docket and parties added, document is a duplicate of #3 Answer that was filed by defendants. (MMS) |
| Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint by Cascade County, Jessie Slaughter. (Higgins, Mark) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Joshua Bartman. Counsel is directed to download and print for service. (Attachments: #1 Issued Summons) (KAH) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Joshua Bartman. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (KAH) (Main Document 1 replaced on 7/5/2022) (KAH). (Attachment 1 replaced on 7/5/2022) (KAH). Modified on 7/5/2022 to reflect incorrect complaint and civil cover sheet attached originally correct documents have been attached (KAH). |
| Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number AMTDC-2897917 (KAH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
