Muzzana v. Shaffer et al
| Dusty Muzzana |
| Randy Shaffer and Krista Macek |
| 4:2022cv00116 |
| December 19, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Montana |
| John Johnston |
| Brian Morris |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Mail sent to Muzzana Returned as Undeliverable. Muzzana still listed as being at CCDC on DOC website; remailed (TAG) |
| Filing 6 CLERK'S JUDGMENT. Mailed to Muzzana (TAG) |
Filing 5
ORDER Directing Monthly Payments be made from Prison Account of Muzzana. Signed by Judge Brian Morris on 1/19/2023. Mailed to Muzzana and CCDF (TAG)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis #1 granted. This dismissal counts as a strike pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). Any appeal of this decision would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Brian Morris on 1/19/2023. Mailed to Muzzana (TAG)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF CASE OPENING re #2 Complaint IFP/Prisoner. Mailed to Muzzana with docket sheet. (TAG) |
| Filing 2 LODGED COMPLAINT IFP/PRISONER (Filing fee $ 402 not paid), filed by Dusty Muzzana. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (TAG) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Dusty Muzzana (Attachments: #1 Account Statement) (TAG) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
