Ohio Security Insurance Company v. AGCO Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Ohio Security Insurance Company
Defendant: AGCO Corporation, Calix AB and Hoven Equipment Company
Case Number: 4:2023cv00004
Filed: February 1, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of Montana
Presiding Judge: Brian Morris
Nature of Suit: Prop. Damage Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 31, 2023 Filing 9 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Hoven Equipment Company. (Witt, Roger)
March 31, 2023 Filing 8 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Hoven Equipment Company. (Witt, Roger)
March 17, 2023 Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement by AGCO Corporation. (Gerdrum, Jill)
March 17, 2023 Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by AGCO Corporation. (Gerdrum, Jill)
February 28, 2023 Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and Complaint. Served on Registered agent on 2/13/23, filed by Ohio Security Insurance Company. AGCO Corporation answer due date 3/6/2023. (Sack, Matthew)
February 7, 2023 Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Complaint and Summons. Served on Hoven Equipment Company on 2/6/2023, filed by Ohio Security Insurance Company. Hoven Equipment Company answer due date 2/27/2023. (Sack, Matthew)
February 3, 2023 Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Ohio Security Insurance Company. (Sack, Matthew)
February 2, 2023 Filing 2 Summons Issued as to AGCO Corporation, Calix AB, Hoven Equipment Company. Issued summons may be downloaded and printed by counsel for service. (Attachments: #1 Calix AB Issued Summons, #2 Hoven Issued Summons) (KAH)
February 1, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against AGCO Corporation, Calix AB, Hoven Equipment Company, filed by Ohio Security Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 AGCO Blank Summons, #3 Calix AB Blank Summons, #4 Hoven Blank Summons) (KAH)
February 1, 2023 Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number AMTDC-3012411. (KAH) Modified on 2/2/2023 to reflect correct date (KAH).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ohio Security Insurance Company v. AGCO Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ohio Security Insurance Company
Represented By: Matthew I. Sack
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AGCO Corporation
Represented By: Jill M. Gerdrum
Represented By: Lauren Michelle LaRance
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Calix AB
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hoven Equipment Company
Represented By: Roger T. Witt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?