Boggs et al v. City of Cut Bank
| Tra Boggs, Dewayne Johnson and Roberta Corby |
| City of Cut Bank |
| 4:2023cv00034 |
| June 26, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Montana |
| Brian Morris |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL CONFERENCE ORDER: Preliminary Pretrial Statement due by 9/19/2023. Joint Discovery Plan due by 9/19/2023. Statement of Stipulated Facts due by 9/19/2023. Telephonic Pretrial Conference set for 9/20/2023 at 01:45 PM before Judge Brian Morris. Signed by Judge Brian Morris on 8/14/2023. (ACC)
|
| Filing 5 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by City of Cut Bank. (Quinn, Marcel) |
| Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Tra Boggs. City of Cut Bank waiver sent on 7/5/2023, answer due 9/5/2023. (Miller, Brian) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to City of Cut Bank. Issued summons may be downloaded and printed by counsel for service. (ACC) |
| Filing 2 Submission of Proposed Summons as to Tra Boggs, re #1 Complaint (Miller, Brian) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against City of Cut Bank, filed by Roberta Corby, Dewayne Johnson, Tra Boggs. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (SAJ) |
| Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number AMTDC-3089787 (SAJ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
