Smith et al v. BNSF Railway Company et al
Russell B. Smith, Jr. |
BNSF Railway Company, John and Jane Does 1 through 100, John Doe Corporations 1 through 10 and Other John Doe entities 1 through 10 |
4:2023cv00082 |
December 15, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Montana |
Brian Morris |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 24, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
***Telephonic Preliminary Pretrial Conference held. A. Sterup, law clerk. (SLL) |
Filing 15 STATEMENT OF STIPULATED FACTS by Russell B. Smith, Jr, Russell B. Smith, Jr(personal representative of the Estate of Irina A. Smith, Deceased). (Sweeney, Christopher) |
Filing 14 JOINT DISCOVERY PLAN by Russell B. Smith, Jr, Russell B. Smith, Jr(personal representative of the Estate of Irina A. Smith, Deceased). (Sweeney, Christopher) |
Filing 13 PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL STATEMENT by Russell B. Smith, Jr, Russell B. Smith, Jr(personal representative of the Estate of Irina A. Smith, Deceased). (Sweeney, Christopher) |
Filing 12 PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL STATEMENT by BNSF Railway Company. (Friend, Michelle) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Acknowledgment of Pro Hac Vice Order by Russell B. Smith, Jr (Fanaroff, Sheri) |
Terminate Deadlines as to #7 Acknowledgments of Pro Hac. (ACC) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Acknowledgment of Pro Hac Vice Order by Russell B. Smith, Jr (Pels, Jon) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Acknowledgment of Pro Hac Vice Order by Russell B. Smith, Jr (Olsen, Maria) |
Filing 8 BNSF's Answer, Affirmative Defenses and Demand for Jury Trial ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by BNSF Railway Company. (Friend, Michelle) |
|
Filing 6 Unopposed MOTION Sheri Fanaroff to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 273 receipt number AMTDC-3180480.). Christopher Sweeney appearing for Plaintiff Russell B. Smith, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1- Affidavit of Sheri Fanaroff, #2 Text of Proposed Order) (Sweeney, Christopher) |
Filing 5 Unopposed MOTION Maria Olsen to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 273 receipt number AMTDC-3180473.). Christopher Sweeney appearing for Plaintiff Russell B. Smith, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1- Affidavit of Maria Olsen, #2 Text of Proposed Order) (Sweeney, Christopher) |
Filing 4 Unopposed MOTION Jon Pels to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 273 receipt number AMTDC-3180326.). Christopher Sweeney appearing for Plaintiff Russell B. Smith, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-Affidavit of Jon Pels, #2 Exhibit 2-Affidavit of Maria Olsen, #3 Exhibit 3-Affidavit of Sheri Fanaroff, #4 Text of Proposed Order) (Sweeney, Christopher) Modified on 12/20/2023 to reflect motion only pertains to Counsel Pels application(ACC). |
Remark: Email to Counsel Sweeney regarding #4 Unopposed motion to admit counsel Pro Hac Vice. Counsel must file a separate Motion, affidavit, and proposed orders are required for each attorney. Docket #4 will apply to Counsel Pels application. (ACC) |
|
Filing 2 Disclosure Statement by BNSF Railway Company. (Friend, Michelle) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Montana Seventeenth Judicial District Court, Blaine County, case number DV-2023-32. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - State Court Complaint, #3 Exhibit B - Issued Summons, #4 Exhibit C - Notice of Dismissal of Berkshire Hathaway Inc., #5 Exhibit D - Notice of Removal) (ACC) |
Filing fee: $ 405.00, receipt number BMTDC-3177592 (ACC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.