Collins v. State of Montana
Plaintiff: George A. Collins
Defendant: State of Montana
Case Number: 6:2007cv00011
Filed: February 8, 2007
Court: US District Court for the District of Montana
Office: Helena Office
County: BROADWATER
Presiding Judge: Donald W. Molloy
Nature of Suit: Constitutional - State Statute
Cause of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 16, 2007 Opinion or Order Filing 4 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 Complaint IFP/Prisoner filed by George A. Collins. Recommendation: The action should be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. All motions should be deemed MOOT. Objections to F&R due by 3/5/2007. Signed by Judge Keith Strong on 2/16/2007. (ASG, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Collins v. State of Montana
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: State of Montana
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: George A. Collins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?