Tabish v. Ferriter et al
| Gregory P. Tabish |
| Mike Ferriter, Mike Mahoney, Ross Swanson, Roxanne Wigert, A. Graham, Ken Cosby, Nick Cook, Tricia Robles, Paul Lucier, Michelle Steyl, Vera Hoscheid and David Pentland |
| 6:2008cv00036 |
| June 23, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Montana |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
| POWELL |
| Donald W. Molloy |
| Keith Strong |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
15
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 in full. Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim. Plaintiff's filing of this action constitutes a strike for the purposes of 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(g). The court certifies that any appeal of this decision would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Donald W. Molloy on 12/5/2008. Copy mailed to Tabish. (TAG, )
|
|
Filing
14
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 2 Complaint IFP/Prisoner filed by Gregory P. Tabish. Recommendation: The Complaint should be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The docket should reflect that this dismissal counts as one strike pursuant to 1915(g) and that any appeal of this decision would not be taken in good faith. Objections to F&R due by 12/1/2008. Signed by Magistrate Keith Strong on 11/13/2008. Copy mailed to Tabish. (ASG, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
