Frank v. Ferriter et al
Kelly Allen Frank |
Mike Ferriter and Mike Mahoney |
6:2008cv00077 |
November 24, 2008 |
US District Court for the District of Montana |
Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
POWELL |
Donald W. Molloy |
Keith Strong |
Plaintiff |
Federal Question |
42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 41 ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 39 in full. 28 Motion to Dismiss filed by Larry Pasha, Gayle Lambert, Jim Willis is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Donald W. Molloy on 9/8/2010. |
Filing 13 ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 12 in full. The claims against Defendants Ferriter and Mahoney are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Donald W. Molloy on 12/30/2009. Copy mailed to Frank. (TAG, ) |
Filing 12 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and Order Directing Clerk to Serve defendant(s). All claims against Defendants Ferriter and Mahoney should be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Court will request Defendants Pasha, Willis, and Lambert to waive service of summ ons. Waiver of Service of Summons is due within 30 days of this Order; if waiver is executed, an answer or other appropriate motion is due within 60 days of this Order. Waiver of Service due by 12/14/2009. Notice of Appearance due by 1/11/2010. Objections to F&R due by 11/27/2009. Signed by Magistrate Keith Strong on 11/9/2009. Copy mailed to Frank. Documents forwarded to counsel for Montana Dept. of Correction as directed.(TAG, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.