Garrett v. Gersovitz et al
| Gurney Lee Garrett |
| Jeremy Gersovitz and Michael Menahan |
| 6:2008cv00082 |
| December 11, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Montana |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
| LEWIS & CLARK |
| Donald W. Molloy |
| Keith Strong |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
8
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 5 in full. Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. This dismissal counts as a strike pursuant to 28 U.S.C. sec. 1915(g). The Court certifies that any appeal of this decision would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Donald W. Molloy on 2/27/2009. Copy mailed to Garrett. (TAG, )
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, 3 MOTION to Change Venue, and 2 Complaint IFP/Prisoner filed by Gurney Lee Garrett. Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. Plai ntiff's Motion to Change Venue is DENIED. Plaintiff's Complaint should be DISMISSED. The docket should reflect that the dismissal counts as a strike pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(g), and that any appeal of this decision would not be taken in good faith. Objections to F&R due by 1/30/2009. Signed by Magistrate Keith Strong on 1/12/2009. Copy mailed to Garrett. (TAG, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
