Sullivan v. State of Montana et al
| Curtis J. Sullivan |
| State of Montana, Montana State Prison and Kohut |
| 6:2009cv00006 |
| March 2, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Montana |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
| POWELL |
| Donald W. Molloy |
| Keith Strong |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
12
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 8 in full. Plaintiff's claims brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the state law claims and they are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. This dismissal counts a strike pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(g). The Court certifies that any appeal of this decision would not be taken in goon faith. Signed by Judge Donald W. Molloy on 5/20/2009. Copy mailed to Sullivan. (TAG, )
|
|
Filing
8
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 7 Amended Complaint, 2 Complaint IFP/Prisoner filed by Curtis J. Sullivan. Plaintiff's Complaint should be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Court should decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction and DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE Plaintiff's state law claims. Objections to F&R due by 5/1/2009. Signed by Magistrate Keith Strong on 4/14/2009. Copy mailed to Sullivan. (TAG, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
