Fossen et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Montana, Inc.
Dale Fossen, D and M Fossen, Inc., Larry Fossen, L and C Fossen, Inc., Marlowe Fossen, M and C Fossen, Inc. and Fossen Brothers Farms |
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Montana, Inc. |
6:2009cv00061 |
October 15, 2009 |
US District Court for the District of Montana |
Helena Office |
LEWIS & CLARK |
Charles C. Lovell |
Insurance |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 93 CLERK'S JUDGMENT in favor of Caring for Montanans against D and M Fossen, Inc., Fossen Brothers Farms, L and C Fossen, Inc., M and C Fossen, Inc., Dale Fossen, Larry Fossen, Marlowe Fossen. Signed by Clerk on 1/27/2014. (HEG, ) |
Filing 92 ORDER denying 48 Motion to Remand; granting 53 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 74 motion to file response to suppl. authority; denying 79 Motion to Certify. Amended Complaint is dismissed. Clerk to enter judgment. Signed by Judge Charles C. Lovell on 1/24/2014. (MKB) |
Filing 32 CLERK'S JUDGMENT in favor of Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Montana, Inc. against D and M Fossen, Inc., Fossen Brothers Farms, Dale Fossen, Larry Fossen, Marlowe Fossen. Deft's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 11) is GRANTED, and Pltf's Amended Complaint is DISMISSED. Deft's Motion to Strike (Doc. 21) is moot. (HEG, ) |
Filing 25 ORDER denying 5 Motion to Remand. Signed by Judge Charles C. Lovell on 8/12/2010. (MKB) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.