McBryde v. Thomas et al
| Cameron McBryde |
| Fern Osler, Doe Defendants, Julie Thomas, Meaghan Shone, Tim Krumb, Montana Department of Corrections, Montana Board of Pardons and Parole, Nexus Treatment Center, Community Corrections and Counseling Services, State of Montana, Derrick Gibbs, Howard Lamely and Craig Thomas |
| 6:2012cv00076 |
| August 17, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Montana |
| Helena Office |
| FERGUS |
| Dana L. Christensen |
| Keith Strong |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
81
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 80 in full. Defendants' motions for summary judgment 53 , 57 are GRANTED. Signed by Judge Dana L. Christensen on 4/29/2014. Mailed to McBryde. (TAG, )
|
|
Filing
78
ORDER granting 51 Motion in Limine; denying 72 Motion for Sanctions. Signed by Magistrate Keith Strong on 12/31/2013. Mailed to McBryde. (TAG, )
|
|
Filing
65
ORDER ADOPTING 49 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in full; denying 31 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Dana L. Christensen on 11/27/2013. Mailed to McBryde. (TAG, )
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 8 in full. Defendants Montana Department of Corrections, Montana Board of Pardons and Parole, and the State of Montana are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. John Doe Defendants are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Dana L. Christensen on 1/22/2013. Mailed to McBryde. (TAG, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
