Conner v. Kirkegard et al
Andrew David Conner |
Leroy Kirkegard, Robert Shaw, Toni Barclay, Associate Warden Woods, Dawn Phillpot, SSG Sweeney, C/O Kent, C/O Short, C/O Cales and C/O Fossness |
6:2015cv00081 |
August 24, 2015 |
US District Court for the District of Montana |
Helena Office |
POWELL |
Dana L. Christensen |
John Johnston |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 82 ORDER ADOPTING 77 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS; granting 64 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 66 Motion for Summary Judgment. Any appeal of this decision would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Dana L. Christensen on 2/12/2018. Mailed to Conner (TAG) |
Filing 59 ORDER denying 56 Motion for Protective Order; granting 58 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge John Johnston on 6/12/2017. Mailed to Conner (TAG) |
Filing 50 ORDER denying 48 Motion to Appoint Counsel ; denying 49 Motion for Reconsideration Signed by Magistrate Judge John Johnston on 1/25/2017. Mailed to Conner. (TAG) |
Filing 46 ORDER denying 44 Motion Examination. Signed by Magistrate Judge John Johnston on 1/10/2017. Mailed to Conner. (TAG) |
Filing 41 ORDER ADOPTING 35 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS; denying 18 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Dana L. Christensen on 12/19/2016. Mailed to Conner. (TAG) |
Filing 34 ORDER denying 32 Motion for Contempt. Signed by Magistrate Judge John Johnston on 10/5/2016. Mailed to Conner. (TAG, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.