McCann v. The Commission on Practice of the Supreme Court of the State of Montana et al
| Genet McCann |
| The Commission on Practice of the Supreme Court of the State of Montana, Ward Talleff, Tracy Axelberg, Office of the State Disciplinary Counsel, Michael Cotter, The Supreme Court of the State of Montana and Mike McGrath |
| 6:2018cv00042 |
| March 23, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Montana |
| Helena Office |
| GALLATIN |
| Sam E Haddon |
| Constitutionality of State Statutes |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1343 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
24
CLERK'S JUDGMENT. Signed by Deputy Clerk on 6/11/2018. (HEG)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER re 18 : To assist the Court in addressing the merits of the extension request, Plaintiff shall have to and including 12:00 p.m. on Friday, May 25, 2018, in which to submit to the Court and file a statement or statements of fact or medical opinion that support and justify the extension request. Signed by Judge Sam E Haddon on 5/22/2018. (HEG)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER denying 3 Motion for temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction as moot. The Temporary Restraining Order requested in 7 Verified Amended Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief is denied. Plaintiff McCann shall serve her Amended Complaint on all Defendants. Signed by Judge Sam E Haddon on 4/16/2018. (NOS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
