Kelly v. Cornish et al
| Stephen P. Kelly |
| Steven Cornish, City of Helena and City of Helena Police Department |
| 6:2021cv00030 |
| April 19, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Montana |
| Sam E Haddon |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff shall have to and including July 9, 2021 in which to file amended complaint that meets and satisfies pleadings requirements necessary and appropriate to state a case within the jurisdiction of this Court. If an appropriate amended complaint is not timely filed, this case will be dismissed. Copy mailed to Kelly. Signed by Judge Sam E Haddon on 6/17/2021. (HEG)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Change of Address by Stephen P. Kelly (TAG) |
| Set Deadlines: Amended Complaint due by 7/9/2021. (HEG) |
| Filing 4 Letter from Kelly re address (TAG) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF CASE OPENING re #2 Complaint IFP/Prisoner. Mailed to Kelly at address given in 2-1 with docket sheet (TAG) |
| Filing 2 LODGED COMPLAINT IFP/PRISONER (Filing fee $ 402 not paid), filed by Stephen P. Kelly. (Attachments: #1 Letter re Address) (TAG) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Stephen P. Kelly (TAG) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
