Hastie v. Montana Housing Authority, Section 8 Butte Hud, District 9 et al
Plaintiff: Annissa Hastie
Defendant: Montana Housing Authority, Section 8 Butte Hud, District 9, Montana Department of Commerce, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development and HRDC Bozeman, et al
Case Number: 6:2021cv00085
Filed: November 1, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Montana
Presiding Judge: Kathleen L DeSoto
Referring Judge: Brian Morris
Nature of Suit: Assault Libel & Slander
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 5, 2021 Filing 4 Brief/Memorandum in Support re #3 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-Letter from Connie Mullikin, #2 Exhibit 2- Letter from Sen. Daines, #3 Exhibit 3- Letter from HUD to Sen. Daines, #4 Exhibit 4- Damages Calculation, #5 Exhibit 5- Declaration of Derya Samadi) (Newman, John)
November 5, 2021 Filing 3 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction John M. Newman appearing for Defendant U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Motions referred to Kathleen L. DeSoto. (Newman, John)
November 2, 2021 Filing 2 NOTICE OF CASE OPENING (Attachments: #1 Notice to Pro Se Litigant and Consent to Electronic Service). Mailed to Plaintiff. (HEG)
November 1, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development from Montana First Judicial District Court, L&C County, case number ADV-2021-743., filed by U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. (Attachments: #1 State Court Complaint, #2 State Court Summons, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (HEG)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hastie v. Montana Housing Authority, Section 8 Butte Hud, District 9 et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Annissa Hastie
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Montana Housing Authority, Section 8 Butte Hud, District 9
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Montana Department of Commerce
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
Represented By: John M. Newman
Represented By: Victoria L. Francis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: HRDC Bozeman, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?