The City of Helena v. United States Environmental Protection Agency et al
The City of Helena |
United States Environmental Protection Agency and Michael Regan |
6:2021cv00088 |
November 16, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Montana |
Sam E Haddon |
Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
05 U.S.C. ยง 702 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to United States Environmental Protection Agency; Leif Johnson U.S. Attorney's Office. Counsel may download summons for service. (HEG) |
Filing 5 Submission of Proposed Summons as to All Defendants, re #1 Complaint (Laughner, Catherine) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Attorney, General - United States Environmental Protection Agency and Michael Regan. Counsel may download summons for service. (Attachments: #1 Michael Regan Summons Issued) (HEG) |
Filing 3 Submission of Proposed Summons as to Michael Regan, re #1 Complaint (Laughner, Catherine) |
Filing 2 Submission of Proposed Summons as to United States Environmental Protection Agency, re #1 Complaint (Laughner, Catherine) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by The City of Helena. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (HEG) |
Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number AMTDC-2767562. (HEG) Modified on 11/17/2021 to update file date (HEG). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.