Covert v. Micu
Plaintiff: Rosemary Covert
Defendant: Austin Micu
Case Number: 6:2022cv00053
Filed: June 30, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Montana
Presiding Judge: Sam E Haddon
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 8, 2022 Filing 5 CLERK'S JUDGMENT. Mailed to Covert (TAG)
July 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice. Signed by Judge Sam E Haddon on 7/8/2022. Mailed to Covert (TAG)
June 30, 2022 Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff Rosemary Covert (TAG)
June 30, 2022 Filing 2 LODGED COMPLAINT IFP/PRISONER (Filing fee $ 402 not paid) (TAG)
June 30, 2022 Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Joseph Covert (TAG)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Covert v. Micu
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rosemary Covert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Austin Micu
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?