Ames Construction, Inc. v. Intermountain Industrial, Inc.
Plaintiff: Ames Construction, Inc.
Defendant: Intermountain Industrial, Inc.
Case Number: 9:2008cv00164
Filed: November 21, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of Montana
Office: Contract: Other Office
County: MISSOULA
Presiding Judge: Donald W. Molloy
Nature of Suit: Both
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 28:1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 27, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 92 ORDER denying 83 Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by Judge Donald W. Molloy on 7/26/2010. (ASG, ) Modified on 7/27/2010 to correct filing date. (ASG, ).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ames Construction, Inc. v. Intermountain Industrial, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ames Construction, Inc.
Represented By: Robert J. Phillips
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Intermountain Industrial, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?