Godfrey v. Mahoney

Godfrey v. Mahoney

Petitioner:	Tracey Godfrey
Respondent:	Mike Mahoney
Case Number:	9:2009cv00035
Filed:	March 27, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the District of Montana
Office:	Habeas Corpus (General) Office
County:	RAVALLI
Presiding Judge:	Jeremiah C. Lynch
Presiding Judge:	Donald W. Molloy
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:	28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 8, 2010	Filing 42 ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 38 in full. Claims AI, A2, B2, Cl, D2, El, and E2, as identified in the Findings and Recommendation, are DENIED on the merits. A certificate ofappealability is DENIED. Signed by Judge Donald W. Molloy on 1/8/2010. Copy mailed to Godfrey. (TAG, )
November 24, 2009	Filing 38 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Tracey Godfrey. Recommendation: Claims A1, A2, B2, C, D2, E1, and E2 should be DENIED on the merits. A certificate of appealability should be DENIED as to these claims. I f the district court accepts this Findings and Recommendation in full and the Findings and Recommendation addressing Claims B1, D1, F, and G, the Clerk of Court should be directed to enter a judgment in favor of Respondents and against Petitioner on all claims. Objections to F&R due by 12/14/2009. Signed by Jeremiah C. Lynch on 11/24/2009. Copy mailed to Godfrey. (ASG, )

Date Filed

Document Text

January 8, 2010

Filing 42 ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 38 in full. Claims AI, A2, B2, Cl, D2, El, and E2, as identified in the Findings and Recommendation, are DENIED on the merits. A certificate ofappealability is DENIED. Signed by Judge Donald W. Molloy on 1/8/2010. Copy mailed to Godfrey. (TAG, )

November 24, 2009

Filing 38 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Tracey Godfrey. Recommendation: Claims A1, A2, B2, C, D2, E1, and E2 should be DENIED on the merits. A certificate of appealability should be DENIED as to these claims. I f the district court accepts this Findings and Recommendation in full and the Findings and Recommendation addressing Claims B1, D1, F, and G, the Clerk of Court should be directed to enter a judgment in favor of Respondents and against Petitioner on all claims. Objections to F&R due by 12/14/2009. Signed by Jeremiah C. Lynch on 11/24/2009. Copy mailed to Godfrey. (ASG, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Godfrey v. Mahoney
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Tracey Godfrey
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Mike Mahoney
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?