Wise v. Rust
Plaintiff: Amanda Wise
Defendant: Richard Rust
Case Number: 9:2009cv00137
Filed: September 18, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Montana
Office: Missoula Office
County: LINCOLN
Presiding Judge: Donald W. Molloy
Nature of Suit: Defendant
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 30, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 54 ORDER granting 13 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 15 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 18 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 21 Motion in Limine; and granting 23 Motion in Limine. Signed by Judge Donald W. Molloy on 11/30/2010. (dle)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wise v. Rust
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amanda Wise
Represented By: Channing Hartelius
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Richard Rust
Represented By: John E. Bohyer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?