Ritchie v. Batista et al
| Steven Ray Ritchie |
| Mike Ferriter and Mike Mahoney |
| 9:2009cv00177 |
| November 25, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Montana |
| Missoula Office |
| RAVALLI |
| Jeremiah C. Lynch |
| Donald W. Molloy |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
115
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 111 in full. Petition 1 is DENIED. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. Signed by Judge Donald W. Molloy on 3/27/2017. (TAG)
|
|
Filing
95
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 91 in full. Petition 1 DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; certificate of appealability GRANTED on the issues of whether Ritchie is entitled to equitable tolling and whether the federal petition was otherwise timely filed. Signed by Judge Donald W. Molloy on 6/18/2014.
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER denying 23 Motion to Supplement; denying 24 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Donald W. Molloy on 7/14/2010. Mailed to Ritchie. (TAG, )
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 12 in full. Petitioner Ritchie's petition is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as time barred. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. Signed by Judge Donald W. Molloy on 6/24/2010. Mailed to Ritchie. (TAG, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
