Evans v. Fink et al
| Marty Evans |
| Attorney General of the State of Montana and Martin Fink |
| 9:2011cv00112 |
| August 17, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Montana |
| Missoula Office |
| LAKE |
| Jeremiah C. Lynch |
| Donald W. Molloy |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
50
ORDER dismissing 49 Petition for Reconsideration. To the extent a certificate of appealability is required and permitted, it is DENIED. Signed by Judge Donald W. Molloy on 11/20/2014. Mailed to Evans. (TAG, )
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 41 in full to the extent not inconsistent with this Order. Claim G presented in the Petition is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Claim J is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim. The state's Motion to Dismiss 31 is DISMISSED as MOOT. Mr. Evans's 1 Petition is DENIED. A Certificate of Appealability is DENIED. Signed by Judge Donald W. Molloy on 8/30/2013. Mailed to Evans. (TAG, )
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS re; 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, claims A-F, H-I and K-Z. These claims are denied; adopting Findings and Recommendations re 22 Findings and Recommendations. Signed by Judge Donald W. Molloy on 10/31/2012. (hard copy mailed to Petitioner, Evans) (CDH, )
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER denying 25 Motion for Release. Signed by Jeremiah C. Lynch on 9/6/2012. Mailed to Evans. (TAG, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
