Native Ecosystems Council et al v. Christiansen et al
Native Ecosystems Council and Alliance for the Wild Rockies |
Vicki Christiansen, United States Forest Service and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service |
9:2012cv00027 |
February 21, 2012 |
US District Court for the District of Montana |
Missoula Office |
MISSOULA |
Dana L. Christensen |
Environmental Matters |
16 U.S.C. ยง 1538 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 105 CLERK'S JUDGMENT in favor of U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, United States Forest Service, Vicki Christiansen against Alliance for the Wild Rockies, Native Ecosystems Council (SGN) |
Filing 102 ORDER granting 101 Motion to Appear Remotely. Signed by Judge Dana L. Christensen on 4/12/2022. Zoom Link sent following order. (ASG) |
Filing 90 ORDER granting 77 Motion for Attorney Fees. The Court will reduce the requested amount and award Defendants to pay $26,904.61. Signed by Judge Dana L. Christensen on 4/4/2019. (ASG) |
Filing 73 ORDER denying 55 Motion to Dissolve Injunction. Signed by Judge Dana L. Christensen on 10/15/2018. (ASG) |
Filing 27 ORDER CLOSING CASE: Defendants are ENJOINED from implementing the Fleecer Mountain Project, and this matter is REMANDED to the Wildlife Service and the Forest Service to address the deficiencies identified in this opinion. Signed by Judge Dana L. Christensen on 5/24/2013. (ASG, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.