Friends of the Wild Swan et al v. Salazar et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|January 14, 2016
IT IS ORDERED that the parties' stipulation (Doc. 85) is APPROVED and ADOPTED. However, the Court will not retain jurisdiction to enforce the parties'stipulation. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs' motion is denied as moot re: 80 Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by Judge Donald W. Molloy on 1/14/2016. (APP, )
|August 21, 2014
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 41 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Friends of the Wild Swan, Natural Resources Defense Council, Montana Environmental Information Center, 48 Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by S.M. R. Jewell, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 51 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by State of Montana Board of Land Commissioners, Montana Department of Natural Resource and Conservation. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter is remanded for the purpose of conducting the analysis required by 16 U.S.C. § 1539(a)(2)(B)(ii) as it relates to grizzly bears. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Plan will remain in effect while this matter is on remand with the exception of the portion of th e Plan that abandons secure core grizzly bear habitat in the Stillwater Block. The agency is enjoined from implementing a new management approach regarding grizzly bear habitat in the Stillwater Block until the requirements of the ESA are met. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. Signed by Judge Donald W. Molloy on 8/21/2014. (NOS, )
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?