Alliance for the Wild Rockies et al v. Marten et al
Plaintiff: Alliance for the Wild Rockies and Native Ecosystems Council
Defendant: Leanne Marten and United States Forest Service
Case Number: 9:2016cv00035
Filed: March 9, 2016
Court: US District Court for the District of Montana
Office: Missoula Office
County: MISSOULA
Presiding Judge: Donald W. Molloy
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters
Cause of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 702
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 27, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 69 ORDER granting 65 Motion to Dismiss. The parties' settlement agreement is ADOPTED and the matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. All pending deadlines are VACATED and pending motions DENIED as MOOT. Signed by Judge Donald W. Molloy on 1/27/2017. (NOS)
January 26, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 66 ORDER that the parties supplement their motion to include a statement as to the position of Defendant Jack Hirschy Livestock, Inc. re 65 Joint MOTION to Dismiss Joint MOTION to Approve Settlement Agreement Joint MOTION Dissolve Injunction . Signed by Judge Donald W. Molloy on 1/26/2017. (APP)
October 3, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 50 ORDER re 19 MOTION to Supplement &/or Complete the Administrative Record, for Judicial Notice, and for Leave to Conduct Limited Discovery filed by Alliance for the Wild Rockies, Native Ecosystems Council, 49 Order on Motion to Supplement. Signed by Judge Donald W. Molloy on 10/3/2016. (DLE)
July 28, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER: Jack Hirschy Livestock, Inc. is JOINED pursuant to Rule 19 as a defendant in this case. Alliance is required to serve the Amended Complaint 18 and a copy of this Order on Hirschy on or before August 5, 2016. Further Ordered that Alliance's motion for a preliminary injunction 16 is GRANTED. Further activity under the Timber Sale is stayed pending the outcome of this litigation. Signed by Judge Donald W. Molloy on 7/28/2016. (ASG, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Alliance for the Wild Rockies et al v. Marten et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alliance for the Wild Rockies
Represented By: Timothy M. Bechtold
Represented By: Rebecca Kay Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Native Ecosystems Council
Represented By: Timothy M. Bechtold
Represented By: Rebecca Kay Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Leanne Marten
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States Forest Service
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?