American Trucking and Transport Insurance Company v. Nelson et al
American Trucking and Transportation Insurance Company |
Ralph Nelson, Robert Gorman, Sr., Bobby J. Gorman, Darrell Gorman, Liz Cannon and Dan Dooley |
9:2016cv00160 |
December 29, 2016 |
US District Court for the District of Montana |
Missoula Office |
MISSOULA |
Dana L. Christensen |
Other Contract |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 121 ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice. Signed by Judge Dana L. Christensen on 9/29/2021. (ASG) |
Filing 110 ORDER dismissing as moot 51 Motion to Dismiss; dismissing as moot 74 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Dana L. Christensen on 9/16/2019. (ASG) |
Filing 107 ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that 101 MOTION to Lift Stay filed by American Trucking and Transportation Insurance Company is GRANTED in part. The stay is lifted for the limited purpose of issuing this Order. For all other purposes, this case remains S TAYED pending arbitration. 48 MOTION to Compel filed by Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company is GRANTED. ATTIC and Westchester shall submit Count XI of the Amended Complaint to arbitration. 95 MOTION to Compel Arbitration as to D efendant Dan Dooley filed by Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company is GRANTED. The parties shall file a joint status report on or before February 17, 2020, apprising the Court of the status of the arbitration proceeding. Signed by Judge Dana L. Christensen on 8/15/2019. (NOS) |
Filing 99 ORDER STAYING CASE pending disposition of Westchester's appeal. Signed by Judge Dana L. Christensen on 11/8/2018. (ASG) |
Filing 91 ORDER denying 71 Motion to Stay. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to the Court's Order dated September 26, 2017 59 , the parties have thirty (30) days from the date of this Order, or until August 27, 2018, to file their opposition to Defendant Westchester's Motion Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P 12(B)(6) to Dismiss Plaintiffs Claims Against Westchester 51 . Westchester may file a reply briefpursuant to the Local Rules. Signed by Judge Dana L. Christensen on 7/27/2018. (ASG) |
Filing 64 ORDER denying 48 Motion to Compel; denying 48 Motion to Stay; granting 54 Motion to Amend/Correct. See Order for deadline to file opposition brief to Defendant Westchester's Motion 51 . Signed by Chief Judge Dana L. Christensen on 4/20/2018. (dle) |
Filing 59 ORDER re 57 Stipulation. All parties shall have thirty (30) days from the date of any denial by the Court of Defendant Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company's Motion to Compel Arbitration and to Stay Plaintiff's Claims against Westchester to file their opposition to Defendant Westchester's Motion Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P 12(B)(6) to Dismiss Plaintiff's Claims Against Westchester. Signed by Judge Dana L. Christensen on 9/26/2017. (ASG) |
Filing 44 ORDER granting 43 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice - Richard C. Mason for Defendant Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company. Signed by Judge Dana L. Christensen on 8/30/2017. (ASG) |
Filing 33 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 4 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Dana L. Christensen on 7/28/2017. (ASG) |
Filing 26 ORDER granting 25 Motion to Dismiss. IT IS ORDERED that Defendants Darrell Gorman and Liz Cannon are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE from this action. Signed by Judge Dana L. Christensen on 5/19/2017. (NOS) |
Filing 7 ORDER granting 6 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice - Kenneth Ulrich and Meredith Kirshenbaum for Defendant Dooley. Signed by Judge Dana L. Christensen on 3/13/2017. (ASG) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.