Eagle Air Med Corporation et al v. Sentinel Air Medical Alliance et al
9:2018mc00004 |
May 14, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Montana |
Missoula Office |
Dana L. Christensen |
Other |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 29 ORDER; The Court conducted a hearing on all pending motions on October 30, 2019.For the reasons stated in open court, Allegiance Benefit Plan Management, Inc.' s Motion for Leave to File Under Seal 25 is DENIED. Plaintiffs' Motion to Com pel Additional Deposition Testimony of James McHugh 11 is DENIED without prejudice to renewal. Plaintiffs may renew the motion if United States District Court Judge Tena Campbell determines: I) that Plaintiffs have pleaded a tortious interference claim against Defendants based upon Jeffrey Frazier's alleged disclosure of confidential information; and 2) the claim continues to exist notwithstanding her Memorandum Decision and Order dated August 30, 2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge John Johnston on 10/31/2019. (TLO) |
Filing 20 ORDER granting 16 Motion to File Under Seal. Signed by Magistrate Judge John Johnston on 10/11/2019. (APP) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Eagle Air Med Corporation et al v. Sentinel Air Medical Alliance et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.