Mitchell et al v. First Call Bail and Surety, Inc. et al
Case Number: 9:2019cv00067
Filed: April 22, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Montana
Office: Missoula Office
Nature of Suit: Racketeer/Corrupt Organization
Cause of Action: 18 U.S.C. ยง 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 129 ORDER: All claims against Defendant Jason Haack are DISMISSED with prejudice. Because no further claims remain in this case, the Clerk is directed to close this case. Signed by Judge Dana L. Christensen on 2/3/2022. Copy mailed to Haack. (ASG)
July 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 127 Order granting 124 motion. This matter is STAYED through January 2022. The trial set for August 30, 2021 is VACATED. The Plaintiffs are instructed to file a motion to dismiss or request for a status conference no later than February 7, 2022. Signed by Judge Dana L. Christensen on 7/30/2021. Copy mailed to Haack with Order 126 . (ASG)
January 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 114 ORDER granting 111 Motion to File Under Seal. Signed by Judge Dana L. Christensen on 1/11/2021. (ASG)
May 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 94 ORDER denying 86 Motion to Intervene in Cross-Claims or, in the Alternative, be Added as Indispensable Parties. Signed by Judge Dana L. Christensen on 5/28/2020. (ASG) Modified on 5/28/2020: Copy mailed to Haack. (ASG).
December 2, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 79 ORDER striking 30 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 43 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 57 Motion. Signed by Judge Dana L. Christensen on 12/2/2019. (ASG)
October 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 54 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 20 Motion to Dismiss. Claim 10 of the Complaint (Doc. 1 ) is Dismissed. All other claims at issue in Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Claims 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, and 7) will advance. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' 47 Motion to Strike is DENIED. Defendants shall have fourteen days to file a Response. Signed by Judge Dana L. Christensen on 10/9/2019. (NOS)
August 29, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 52 ORDER granting 51 Motion to Stay Briefing. All briefing on Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is stayed until after this Court's ruling on Defendants' Motion to Strike 47 . Signed by Judge Dana L. Christensen on 8/29/2019. (ASG)
June 11, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER granting in part 23 motion to serve process. Clerk of Court shall address and send a copy of the summons and complaint in this case via mail service requiring a signed receipt to Jason Lee Haack. Signed by Judge Dana L. Christensen on 6/11/2019. (ASG)
April 24, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER granting 8 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice; granting 9 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice - Toby Marshall and Blythe Chandler for Plaintiff. Signed by Judge Dana L. Christensen on 4/24/2019. Served via CM/ECF on local counsel. (ASG)
April 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER denying without prejudice 3 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice; denying without prejudice 4 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice; granting 5 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice - Andrea Rose Woods for Plaintiffs. Signed by Judge Dana L. Christensen on 4/22/2019. (ASG)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mitchell et al v. First Call Bail and Surety, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?