Jenkins et al v. Ravalli County et al
Crystal Combs, Kenneth Jenkins and Paul Jenkins |
Reed Scott, Lewis and Clark County, Ravalli County, Chuck O'Reilly, Sterling Maus, John Does 1-10, Jefferson County, Tim Campbell, Sam McCormack, Tom Dawson, Jay Carlson and James R. Chinn |
9:2019cv00146 |
August 27, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Montana |
Dana L Christensen |
John Johnston |
Donald W Molloy |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT and Jury Demand against All Defendants, filed by Paul Jenkins. (Bell, Robert) |
Filing 3 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. This case is reassigned to United States DistrictJudge Dana L. Christensen with referral to United States Magistrate Judge John T. Johnston pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(l). Signed by Judge Dana L. Christensen on 9/4/2019. (ASG) |
Filing 2 ORDER OF RECUSAL. Judge Donald W. Molloy recused. Signed by Judge Donald W. Molloy on 9/4/2019. (ASG) |
Judge Dana L. Christensen and Magistrate Judge John Johnston added. (ASG) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ravalli County, Sterling Maus, Jefferson County, Tom Dawson, Tim Campbell, Jay Carlson, Lewis and Clark County, Chuck O'Reilly, Sam McCormack, Reed Scott, and John Does 1-10 filed by Paul Jenkins, Kenneth Jenkins, and Crystal Combs. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (NOS) |
Filing fee of $400 received; receipt number 0977-2358897. (NOS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.