In re Maxvill
Petitioner: Jack Maxvill
Case Number: 9:2019cv00167
Filed: October 9, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Montana
Presiding Judge: Dana L Christensen
Referring Judge: Kathleen L DeSoto
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 21, 2019 Filing 4 CLERK'S JUDGMENT. Mailed to Maxvill (TAG)
November 21, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS for #2 Findings and Recommendations in full. COA denied. Signed by Judge Dana L. Christensen on 11/21/2019. Mailed to Maxvill (TAG)
October 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Jack Maxvill. Judge Magistrate Judge Kathleen L. DeSoto termed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kathleen L. DeSoto on 10/16/2019. Mailed to Maxvill (TAG)
October 9, 2019 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5 not paid), filed by Jack Maxvill. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Letters) (TAG)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: In re Maxvill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jack Maxvill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?