Kelly v. Imagineif Library Entity et al
| Stephen P. Kelly |
| Connie Behe, Flathead County, Imagineif Library Entity and Jane Doe |
| 9:2021cv00006 |
| January 11, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Montana |
| Dana L Christensen |
| Kathleen L DeSoto |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
MOTION to Direct Service by Plaintiff Stephen P. Kelly. Motions referred to Kathleen L. DeSoto. (TAG)
|
|
Filing 6
MOTION to Compel by Plaintiff Stephen P. Kelly. Motions referred to Kathleen L. DeSoto. (TAG)
|
|
Filing 5
MOTION for Hearing by Plaintiff Stephen P. Kelly. Motions referred to Kathleen L. DeSoto. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (TAG)
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION for Hearing by Plaintiff Stephen P. Kelly. Motions referred to Kathleen L. DeSoto. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (TAG)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE OF CASE OPENING re #2 Complaint IFP/Prisoner. Mailed to Kelly with docket sheet at address given in Letter (Attachments: #1 NOTICE TO PRO SE LITIGANTS AND CONSENT TO ELECTRONIC SERVICE, #2 PRO SE REQUEST TO FILE BY EMAIL) (TAG)
|
|
Filing 2
LODGED COMPLAINT IFP/PRISONER (Filing fee $ 402 not paid), filed by Stephen P. Kelly. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Letter) (TAG)
|
|
Filing 1
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Stephen P. Kelly. Motions referred to Kathleen L. DeSoto. (TAG)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
