Paszek v. Peitzmeier Demolition & Concrete Cutting, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Judith Paszek
Defendant: Philip Siemer and Peitzmeier Demolition & Concrete Cutting, Inc.
Case Number: 9:2021cv00011
Filed: January 26, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Montana
Presiding Judge: Dana L Christensen
Referring Judge: Kathleen L DeSoto
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER granting #8 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Eric S. Olson. Acknowledgment of PHV Order due by 4/1/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kathleen L. DeSoto on 3/17/2021. (APP)
March 16, 2021 Filing 8 MOTION Eric S. Olson to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 262 receipt number 0977-2634190.) Douglas F. Day appearing for Plaintiff Judith Paszek Motions referred to Kathleen L. DeSoto. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Affidavit of Douglas Day, #2 Affidavit Affidavit of Eric Olson) (Day, Douglas)
March 1, 2021 Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Peitzmeier Demolition & Concrete Cutting, Inc.. (Halverson, James)
March 1, 2021 Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by Peitzmeier Demolition & Concrete Cutting, Inc., Philip Siemer. (Halverson, James)
February 2, 2021 Filing 5 Summonses Issued as to all defendants. Counsel is instructed to download summonses for service. (Attachments: #1 summons 2) (ASG)
February 2, 2021 Filing 4 Submission of Proposed Summons as to Philip Siemer, re #1 Complaint (Day, Douglas)
February 2, 2021 Filing 3 Submission of Proposed Summons as to Judith Paszek, re #1 Complaint (Day, Douglas)
February 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL CONFERENCE ORDERPreliminary Pretrial Statement due by 4/27/2021. Joint Discovery Plan due by 4/27/2021. Statement of Stipulated Facts due by 4/27/2021. Pretrial Conference set for 5/4/2021 at 11:00 AM in Missoula, MT before Magistrate Judge Kathleen L. DeSoto. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kathleen L. DeSoto on 2/1/2021. (TXB)
January 26, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT and Demand for Jury Trial against Peitzmeier Demolition & Concrete Cutting, Inc. and Philip Siemer filed by Judith Paszek. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (NOS)
January 26, 2021 Filing fee paid: $402.00, receipt number MTX900015826. (NOS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Paszek v. Peitzmeier Demolition & Concrete Cutting, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Judith Paszek
Represented By: Douglas F. Day
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Philip Siemer
Represented By: James R. Halverson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Peitzmeier Demolition & Concrete Cutting, Inc.
Represented By: James R. Halverson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?