Chyatte v. Gootkin et al
| Douglas J. Chyatte |
| Brian Gootkin, Travis Hettick and Austin Knudsen |
| 9:2021cv00030 |
| March 17, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Montana |
| Dana L Christensen |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Letter from Chyatte re IFP (TAG) |
| Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number MTX9-16058 (TAG) |
| Filing 8 Agreement to Allow Pro Se Party to File by E-Mail. (TAG) |
| Filing 7 Pro Se Request for Leave to File by E-mail by Douglas J. Chyatte. (TAG) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Consent to Electronic Service by Douglas J. Chyatte (TAG) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF CASE OPENING re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Mailed to Chyatte with docket sheet. (Attachments: #1 NOTICE TO PRO SE LITIGANTS AND CONSENT TO ELECTRONIC SERVICE, #2 PRO SE REQUEST TO FILE BY EMAIL) (TAG) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Petitioner Douglas J. Chyatte (TAG) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Petitioner Douglas J. Chyatte (Attachments: #1 Account Statement) (TAG) |
| Filing 2 Brief/Memorandum in Support re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Douglas J. Chyatte. (Attachments: #1 Appendix) (TAG) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5 not paid), filed by Douglas J. Chyatte. (TAG) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
