Bentle et al v. Detroit Behavioral Institute, LLC et al
Romy Bentle and Eric Bentle |
Detroit Behavioral Institute, LLC and Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc. |
9:2021cv00045 |
April 9, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Montana |
Dana L Christensen |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Detroit Behavioral Institute, LLC. (Hausbeck, Elizabeth) |
Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by Detroit Behavioral Institute, LLC. (Hausbeck, Elizabeth) |
Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc.. (Hausbeck, Elizabeth) |
Filing 5 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc.. (Hausbeck, Elizabeth) |
Filing 4 ORDER granting motion #3 . Defendants DBI and Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc. shall file their answer(s) or other responsive pleading(s) on or before May 24, 2021. Signed by Judge Dana L. Christensen on 5/11/2021. (ASG) |
Filing 3 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Detroit Behavioral Institute, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order) (Hausbeck, Elizabeth) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (KJL) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Romy Bentle, Eric Bentle. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (KJL) |
Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number 0977-2647872 (KJL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.